AI Case Analysis Built for Trial Lawyers
Litigation discovery produces thousands of pages of messy filings, dense depositions, and conflicting exhibits. Cleros AI deploys a 7-agent legal reasoning Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) that reads every page, isolates material facts, catches sworn contradictions, and generates trial-ready strategy memos in minutes instead of weeks.
7
Collaborative Legal Agents
10,000+
Pages Synthesized / Docket
98.4%
Citation Traceability Rate
40+ Hrs
Saved Per Trial Preparation
How the 7-Agent Legal DAG Evaluates Your Case
Unlike shallow AI tools that run single prompt queries, Cleros AI executes a chained pipeline of specialized cognitive legal models. Each agent rigorously audits one dimension of litigation theory before passing structured intelligence downstream.
Timeline & Event Extraction
Parses multi-party complaints, answers, and exhibits to extract every material date, event, and transactional occurrence into an immutable, hyperlinked chronological ledger.
Relationship & Knowledge Mapping
Maps corporate structures, individual witnesses, agency relationships, and knowledge horizons to expose who knew what, when they knew it, and what duty was owed.
Elements & Burdens of Proof
Dissects every asserted claim and affirmative defense into statutory and common-law elements, evaluating the burden of proof required for each cause of action.
Document & Testimony Triangulation
Maps documentary exhibits, email correspondence, and sworn testimony against specific claim elements to identify airtight corroboration and critical evidentiary gaps under Federal Rules of Evidence standards.
Sworn Inconsistency Discovery
Cross-references interrogatories, deposition transcripts, and contemporaneous emails to surface direct contradictions, timeline discrepancies, and impeachment opportunities.
Exposure & Fault Allocation
Assesses comparative fault, proximate causation arguments, statutory damage caps, and affirmative defense viability under specific venue jurisdiction rules.
Narrative & Opening Framing
Synthesizes the findings of all upstream agents into an actionable trial strategy memo: core themes, story arcs, risk ratings, and courtroom recommendations.
Solving the Litigator's Blind Spot: Sworn Testimony vs. Contemporary Record
In high-stakes civil and commercial litigation, cases rarely turn on high-minded constitutional philosophy; they are won or lost in the granular discrepancies between what a key witness stated under oath in a deposition versus what contemporaneous emails reveal.
Automated Element-to-Proof Correlation
When asserting or defending claims such as breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, or gross negligence, every element requires specific evidentiary support under FRE 702 and the Daubert standard. Cleros AI automatically organizes your uploaded record into an interactive matrix showing which claims have bulletproof documentary support and which claims hinge precariously on uncorroborated oral testimony.
Immediate Impeachment Identification
Trial attorneys traditionally spend hundreds of associate hours creating deposition digests. Agent 05 (Contradiction Hunter) reads every deposition alongside all documentary productions, surfacing contradictions with exact page and line citations so your trial team can construct lethal impeachment outlines in minutes.
From Document Ingestion to Trial Strategy Memo
How litigation teams integrate Cleros AI into daily case preparation.
Create Case & Select Venue
Specify your matter details, select jurisdiction (federal district or state/county venue), and define plaintiff and defense parties.
Drop Filings & Transcripts
Upload pleadings, discovery responses, key contracts, expert disclosures, and deposition transcripts with automatic multi-file OCR processing.
Receive 7-Agent Strategy
Review interactive timelines, contradiction lists, and case strength ratings, or export a formatted litigation strategy brief directly to PDF.
AI Case Analysis & Litigation Intelligence FAQ
Common questions regarding accuracy, legal security, and integration.
What makes the 7-agent DAG different from a standard AI chatbot?
Generic chatbots analyze documents sequentially using a single generic prompt, which causes hallucinations, lost nuance, and context degradation on large dockets. Cleros AI employs a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) of seven specialized legal agents. Each agent performs a dedicated analytical discipline—such as statutory element decomposition or sworn statement contradiction checks—passing structured, cross-validated artifacts to subsequent agents. The result is verifiable legal work product with line-level citations.
How does Cleros AI handle large volumes of depositions and discovery documents?
Our litigation ingestion pipeline handles hundreds of documents simultaneously, including OCR-scanned PDFs, native Word files, PTX/ASCII deposition transcripts, contracts, and electronic discovery productions. Document text is indexed into localized vector spaces with semantic chunking that preserves paragraph hierarchy, Bates numbering, and exhibit markers.
Can opposing counsel or third parties access our case files?
No. Cleros AI adheres to strict SOC 2 Type II controls and zero-knowledge data architecture. Your filings, privileged work product, and trial notes reside in isolated tenant containers encrypted with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. Furthermore, our agreements strictly guarantee that your client matter data is never used to train global commercial AI models.
How does the evidence contradiction engine aid cross-examination preparation?
The Contradiction Hunter analyzes deposition transcripts against internal emails, text logs, and prior interrogatory responses. When a witness's sworn testimony diverges from contemporaneous written communications, Cleros AI flags the contradiction, cites the transcript page/line number alongside the conflicting exhibit, and generates ready-to-use cross-examination traps.
Ready to Analyze Your Next Matter in Minutes?
Test Cleros AI risk-free on your upcoming trial, mediation, or dispositive motion. Free trial includes 1 full case analysis credit.